﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>www.justcoding.com - Outpatient Coding Spotlight</title><link>http://www.justcoding.com</link><description>This is an HCPro Company.</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2013 JustCoding</copyright><item><title>GEMs a useful addition to ICD-10-CM transition tool kit</title><description>General equivalence mapping (GEM) is a good tool to use to convert ICD-9-CM codes to ICD-10-CM, but the maps&amp;amp;nbsp;are only a tool. Lori Andersen, MS, and Patrick Romano, MD, MPH, explain to use GEMs as part of your ICD-10 coding transition.</description><link>http://www.justcoding.com/292169/gems-a-useful-addition-to-icd10cm-transition-tool-kit</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is computer-assisted coding the answer to projected coder productivity declines in ICD-10?</title><description>Coder productivity is expected to decline by as much as 50% immediately after the transition to ICD-10. Many organizations are looking to computer-assisted coding (CAC) to help offset those productivity declines. Lisa Knowles-Ward, RHIT, CCS, and Susan White, PhD, CHDA, discuss the results of the Cleveland Clinic&amp;amp;rsquo;s study of coding accuracy and productivity with CAC.</description><link>http://www.justcoding.com/292170/is-computerassisted-coding-the-answer-to-projected-coder-productivity-declines-in-icd10</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Check out the view from the industry as ICD-10 implementation draws closer</title><description>Everyone in healthcare&amp;amp;mdash;providers and payers alike&amp;amp;mdash;faces the same problems when preparing for ICD-10 implementation. Stephen Spain, MD, CPC, Michael Miscoe, Esq., CPC, CPCO, CASCC, CCPC, CUC, and Annie Boynton, BS, RHIT, CPC, CCS, CPC-H, CCS-P, CPC-P, CPC-I, offer the physician, compliance, and payer perspectives on the ICD-10 transition.</description><link>http://www.justcoding.com/292171/check-out-the-view-from-the-industry-as-icd10-implementation-draws-closer</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Healthcare News: CMS nears completion of NCD translation to ICD-10-CM</title><description>CMS is translating only 27% of its current National Coverage Determinations (NCD) from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM, according to Janet Anderson Brock, CMS&amp;amp;rsquo; director of the Division of Operations and Information Management, Coverage and Analysis Group Center for Clinical Standards and Quality.</description><link>http://www.justcoding.com/292172/healthcare-news-cms-nears-completion-of-ncd-translation-to-icd10cm</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Q&amp;amp;A: Coding for cerebral hemorrhage sequela in ICD-10-CM</title><description>Q: A patient suffered a nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage six months ago and is now being seen for long-standing aphasia as a result of the stroke. How would we code this in ICD-10-CM?</description><link>http://www.justcoding.com/292173/qa-coding-for-cerebral-hemorrhage-sequela-in-icd10cm</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Understand anatomy to transition reporting hypertension from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM</title><description>According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 31% of all American adults have high blood pressure, so odds are coders see the condition documented often. Shelley C. Safian, PhD, CCS-P, CPC-H, CPC-I, AHIMA-Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer, compares coding for hypertension in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM.</description><link>http://www.justcoding.com/291677/understand-anatomy-to-transition-reporting-hypertension-from-icd9cm-to-icd10cm</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ten steps to code for anesthesia services</title><description>Anesthesia coding in some ways is similar to evaluation and management coding&amp;amp;mdash;only easier. Chandra Stephenson, CPC, CPC-H, CPMA, CPC-I, CANPC, CEMC, CFPC, CGSC, CIMC, COSC, explained the 10 steps to coding anesthesia during the AAPC National Conference in Orlando, Fla., April 14-17.</description><link>http://www.justcoding.com/291678/ten-steps-to-code-for-anesthesia-services</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>CMS corrects edit 84, deletes modifiers</title><description>CMS corrected edit 84, added five APCs, deleted two APCs, and changed the description of another as part of the April updates to the I/OCE. Dave Fee, MBA, reviews the most significant changes CMS implemented</description><link>http://www.justcoding.com/291679/cms-corrects-edit-84-deletes-modifiers</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Healthcare News:  CMS releases Quarterly Provider Compliance Newsletter</title><description>The April 2013 issue of CMS&amp;amp;rsquo; Medicare Quarterly Provider Compliance Newsletter highlights two Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) issues that affect outpatient providers.</description><link>http://www.justcoding.com/291682/healthcare-news--cms-releases-quarterly-provider-compliance-newsletter</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Q&amp;amp;A: Performing multiple fusions at same spinal level</title><description>Q: If a patient has a spinal deformity on L5-S1 and we use the appropriate codes from 2280X and then the physician performs an arthrodesis/fusion on the same level, can we bill the appropriate fusion codes (225XX-226XX) as well?&amp;amp;nbsp; My impression is no, but I would love to get some insight into this question.</description><link>http://www.justcoding.com/291683/qa-performing-multiple-fusions-at-same-spinal-level</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Local Coverage Determinations provide the missing link to complement coding guidelines</title><description>The missing link to correct coding is coder knowledge and practical application of Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs). Glenn Krauss, BBA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, C-CDI, CCDS, reveals how LCDs compliment official coding guidelines for compliant coding.</description><link>http://www.justcoding.com/291201/local-coverage-determinations-provide-the-missing-link-to-complement-coding-guidelines</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>New molecular pathology coding still complex</title><description>At first glance, the new CPT&amp;amp;reg; codes for reporting molecular pathology services might seem simple. They certainly look easier than the old stacking codes that focused on methodology and processes, resulting in multiple codes and quantities being used to report a single test. Jugna Shah, MPH, and Michelle L. Ruben, detail some of the nuances of correct code assignment for molecular pathology tests.</description><link>http://www.justcoding.com/291202/new-molecular-pathology-coding-still-complex</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Audits help lock down processes, clarify coding</title><description>More and more entities are auditing healthcare claims-Recovery Auditors, Medicare Integrity Contractors, MACs, FIs, commercial payers, and on and on. &amp;amp;shy;Andrea Clark, RHIA, CCS, CPC-H, CEO, Debbie Mackaman, RHIA, CHCO, and Peggy Stilley, CPC, CPMA, CPC-I, COBGC, ACS-OB, explain how coders and their organizations can benefit from internal audits.</description><link>http://www.justcoding.com/291203/audits-help-lock-down-processes-clarify-coding</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Healthcare News: CMS adds codes to conditionally bilateral list</title><description>CMS added seven CPT&amp;amp;reg; codes to the conditionally bilateral list as part of the April update to the Integrated Outpatient Code Editor. When a provider performs a conditionally bilateral service bilaterally, coders must append modifier -50 (bilateral procedure) to the code.</description><link>http://www.justcoding.com/291204/healthcare-news-cms-adds-codes-to-conditionally-bilateral-list</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Q&amp;amp;A: ICD-9 coding for screening pap</title><description>Q: A physician&amp;apos;s office collects a pap specimen and sends the specimen to the hospital lab for processing.&amp;amp;nbsp;The physician&amp;apos;s office lists ICD-9-CM code V72.31 (general gynecological examination with or without Papanicolaou cervical smear) as the diagnosis for this service.&amp;amp;nbsp;What is the proper diagnosis code for the hospital to use for billing when only processing the specimen? </description><link>http://www.justcoding.com/291205/qa-icd9-coding-for-screening-pap</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Scrutinize documentation for clues to code breast biopsies</title><description>Breast biopsies should be easy to code because coders have so few codes to assign, but it is one area where documentation is lacking. Stacie L. Buck, RHIA, CCS-P, RCC, CIC, reveals what key elements coders should look for in a breast biopsy note.</description><link>http://www.justcoding.com/290731/scrutinize-documentation-for-clues-to-code-breast-biopsies</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Use case studies to determine ED E/M level</title><description>With no national guidelines in place for facilities to use to determine evaluation and management (E/M) level, coders must apply their facility&amp;amp;rsquo;s guidelines when coding an outpatient&amp;amp;nbsp;visit. Caral Edelberg, CPC, CPMA, CAC, CCS-P, CHC, and Joanne M. Becker, RHIT, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, use three ED case studies to highlight potential pitfalls for ED E/M leveling.</description><link>http://www.justcoding.com/290732/use-case-studies-to-determine-ed-em-level</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>CMS changes Medically Unlikely Edits</title><description>CMS is making a significant change to the Medically Unlikely Edits (MUE) by changing some of them from line-item edits to date-of-service edits, effective April 1. Jugna Shah, MPH, Kathy Dorale, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, John Settlemyer, MBA/MHA, and Valerie Rinkle, MPA, explain how the change could affect coding and reimbursement.</description><link>http://www.justcoding.com/290733/cms-changes-medically-unlikely-edits</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Healthcare News: CMS revises device/procedure edits</title><description>CMS added numerous device/procedure edits as part of the April update to the Integrated Outpatient Code Editor. To avoid triggering the edits, coders must report particular procedure codes and device codes together on the claim form.</description><link>http://www.justcoding.com/290734/healthcare-news-cms-revises-deviceprocedure-edits</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Q&amp;amp;A: ICD-9 codes for lumbrosacral radiology</title><description>Q: We received an outpatient radiology report&amp;amp;nbsp;(exam performed 7/11/12) where the radiologist states:
CLINICAL INDICATION:&amp;amp;nbsp;LUMBOSACRAL NEURITIS
EXAM:&amp;amp;nbsp;LUM SPINE AP/LAT
CLINICAL STATEMENT:&amp;amp;nbsp;LUMBOSACRAL NEURITIS
COMPARISON:&amp;amp;nbsp;MAY 23, 2012
FINDINGS:&amp;amp;nbsp;There is posterior spinal fusion L-3-L-5 with solid posterolateral bridging bone graft. Pedicle screws and rods are stable in position. There are bilateral laminectomy defects at L3-L-4. The vertebral body and disc space heights are preserved. The spinal alignment is maintained without evidence of spondylolisthesis. No acute fracture is identified. No lytic or blastic lesions are seen. The sacroiliac joints are unremarkable.
IMPRESSION:&amp;amp;nbsp;Stable postsurgical changes with solid posterolateral fusion graft.
&amp;amp;nbsp;
Would you use the following ICD-9 codes:&amp;amp;nbsp;V67.09, 724.4. or 724.4, V45.4? Our coders disagree. </description><link>http://www.justcoding.com/290735/qa-icd9-codes-for-lumbrosacral-radiology</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>